My Progressive Platform For 2006
Terrance—over at The Republic of T—asks a simple, yet provocative question in preparation of the 2006 elections: What’s Your Platform?
Okay, I’m game. Here are my most imperative policy reforms, in no particular order.
1) 2.0 the hell out of government
Congress was only able to see "finished" intelligence before voting to give the Bush administration power to go to war (as a last resort). In my world, anything that the Executive branch sees, the Legislative branch sees. My voice is represented by my state officials, not the president. This one example of a non-transparent government directly led to the deaths of more than 30,000 human beings.
The most applicable 2.0 philosophy for reforming government is the philosophy of openness. From open source to open content, imagine the possibilities of employing a government that makes all de-classified government documents, congressional voting records, appointee resumes, etc. instantly available in a relational database with open APIs for public use. All of this information is available now, but it’s not prepped for accessibility and reuse. This is the future of accountability. Up communication and transparency, reduce the "Fuck You!" noise of the left vs. the right blogosphere to constructive collaboration… that is until government tries to pull something, and then we get back on them like white on rice.
2) Create a nominal tax to directly supplement teacher salaries
Great teachers are few and far between nowadays. Why? Well, you try dealing with kids, administrators and parents all day, adhere to and circumvent the red-tape and legalities of this age with the grace of a seasoned politician and pull in ~$45k per year.
I’m talking about, say, a .1% tax that goes directly towards teacher salaries. I gotta admit, I got the idea from Mini-Me when he appeared as a genius teacher on an episode of Boston Public a few years back. His thesis was that the degree to which students are prepared by their public school years directly impacts their earning potential, so reward their hometown education system with a nominal, flat tax return to impact teacher salaries. Tell ‘em. Verne!
3) Rip up the Patriot Act
As alluded to in the first part of my platform, transparency of government will lead to politicians being held accountable to create humane national and global policies. It’ll also foster the innovation of extremely real-time and smart communication user experiences, which can then be applied by government in the authenticated realm of classified material.
This edict of transparency cannot be applied to individuals. Our individual right of privacy is what has distinguished us from the rest of the world for centuries. The Patriot Act is legislation with language that allows for the control, intimidation and investigation of Americans through the guise of terrorism. It’s like the old censorship debate; who defines what is terrorism? The abuse of American rights have already begun.
4) Election reforms
First, all television campaigns are free. Each major candidate (there would have to be some way to determine "major," possibly something akin to the BSC polls/stats via past political progress made) is provided a set amount of credits to apply to the "purchase" of air time. This opens up the playing field to a diverse class of politicians who can focus on the issues, not their fund raising. I bet Tom Delay would even go for this.
Second, ensure that voting is both easy to access and secure. All voting systems could easily be tied together into one database, while creating alternative voting options, such as over the internet and by phone. We’ve been to the moon people…
5) National health care for everyone… Yes, you too
Riddle me this: Large corporations get major discounts on health care coverage due to the amount of employees they staff, right? Okay, then why not treat congressional districts as semantic equivalents of large pools of employees (citizen residents) by submitting them as huge groups into the bidding process?
C’mon, try to tell me why that doesn’t make any sense.
6) Incentivize industry to reduce our dependency on oil and clean up the environment
I know, the oil industry has major power claws dug deep into our political system, but this is my platform, so I’ll risk the blunt gas nozzle to the back of my head. This current administration gave tax breaks to manufacturers who create hybrid vehicles, but capped the production of cars to 60,000 that qualify for the break. Yeah.
First, we create California-like emmission standards and apply it nationally. Second, we apply money to develop alternative forms of fuel instead of planning a fucking trip to Mars or building that damn bridge to nowhere in Alaska. Third… well, I’m not that smart, but these people are.
Well, that’s my platform. God knows there are other extremely important issues (like getting out of Iraq, impeaching Bush, etc.), but that’s all the brainpower I have for tonight. I’m sure many of you want to label me as a liberal communist or some other "sticks and stones" nomenclature, and if I just described your take on me, my message to you is grow the fuck up. These are serious times, calling for serious people. The longer you avoid engaging in honest discussions along these lines, the easier it becomes to spot your agenda.
To the rest of you, let’s work together to get these bozos out of office in 2006.
Tags: accountability, activism, America, business, change, citizen, communication, community, corporation, democracy, discourse, empowerment, government, health care, information, internet, leadership, legislation, natural resources, Noam Chomsky, patriotic, philosophy, politics, power, progressive, recommendation, Republican Party, Senate, sustainable, teaching, Tom Delay, transparency, TV, World 2.0.6 Responses to “My Progressive Platform For 2006”
- 1 Pingback on Mar 5th, 2006 at 2:49 am
- 2 Pingback on Nov 1st, 2006 at 6:47 pm
- 3 Pingback on Nov 8th, 2006 at 11:53 pm
Search
No Tweets RSS feedLatest Posts
- shot hoops for the second time…
- the downtown wyndham block par…
- will ridenour on the kora has …
- there’s a yetter outside my of…
- beardslee was great, possum je…
- greensboro apple store under c…
- blinksale secure server certif…
- damn, another beautiful summer…
- trying to avoid exageration, b…
- and i quote, “it smelled like …
What I Write About (see all)
- 9 11 accountability activism Adam Smith Problem advertising America antiwar artsy fartsy blogging business capitalism change citizen media community Congress corporation corruption creativity disturbing experience design film funny George Bush government graffiti Greensboro Hip hop humanity information architecture innovation inspiration internet Iraq War journalism lyrics media music New World Order New York City North Carolina personal philosophy photography poetry politics reality Republican Party terrorism video World 2.0
Great blog I hope we can work to build a better health care system. Health insurance is a major aspect to many.
“This current administration gave tax breaks to manufacturers who create hybrid vehicles, but capped the production of cars to 60,000 that qualify for the break. ”
That’s not quite accurate.
First, the tax break is for purchasers of hybrids, not manufacturers. Second, the break only *starts* to phase out after 60,000 sales *per manufacturer*. The break does not immediately stop after 60,000; rather, the quarter the 60,000-mark is hit is the last quarter of a full tax break, and the tax break decreases quarterly thereafter until eventually petering out. US News, simply put, has it wrong.
I’m speaking as a Prius owner who researched the hell out of this issue before buying in January, and who follows the threads on www.priuschat.com regularly.
thanks for the clarification, mark. i guess the remaining question — if we’re as addicted to oil as the president says (and we know) — is why set a phase out point?