<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&#038;T: Blogging Made Speechless</title>
	<link>http://www.seancoon.org/2006/01/att_blogging_made_speechless.html</link>
	<description>so many dots, so little time...</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Coon</title>
		<link>http://www.seancoon.org/2006/01/att_blogging_made_speechless.html#comment-399</link>
		<author>Sean Coon</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seancoon.org/2006/01/att_blogging_made_speechless.html#comment-399</guid>
		<description>well, with any search engine, if there are no results for "blog" there will be no results for "blogging." try it for yourself; click on the results image, go to the site and try "blogging" (i just did it and nothing returned in "all of at&#38;t).

i don't know what you mean by 5-6 levels down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, with any search engine, if there are no results for &#8220;blog&#8221; there will be no results for &#8220;blogging.&#8221; try it for yourself; click on the results image, go to the site and try &#8220;blogging&#8221; (i just did it and nothing returned in &#8220;all of at&amp;t).</p>
<p>i don&#8217;t know what you mean by 5-6 levels down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yclipse</title>
		<link>http://www.seancoon.org/2006/01/att_blogging_made_speechless.html#comment-398</link>
		<author>yclipse</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seancoon.org/2006/01/att_blogging_made_speechless.html#comment-398</guid>
		<description>The post is a little misleading. There are some hits when you enter "blogging" instead of "blog" into the search box, found 5-6 levels down. The entries are anemic as hell, and do not match the high-priced campaign, but there are hits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post is a little misleading. There are some hits when you enter &#8220;blogging&#8221; instead of &#8220;blog&#8221; into the search box, found 5-6 levels down. The entries are anemic as hell, and do not match the high-priced campaign, but there are hits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tins ::: Rick Klau's weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.seancoon.org/2006/01/att_blogging_made_speechless.html#comment-386</link>
		<author>tins ::: Rick Klau's weblog</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seancoon.org/2006/01/att_blogging_made_speechless.html#comment-386</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Blogging Delivered. Just not searchable.&lt;/strong&gt;

You may have seen the AT&#38;T billboards claiming &#8220;blogging delivered&#8221; for AT&#38;T (er, sorry - that&#8217;s at&#38;t). I love that this blogger called them out, and pointed out that the word &#8220;blog&#8221; is nowhere to be found on t...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blogging Delivered. Just not searchable.</strong></p>
<p>You may have seen the AT&amp;T billboards claiming &#8220;blogging delivered&#8221; for AT&amp;T (er, sorry - that&#8217;s at&amp;t). I love that this blogger called them out, and pointed out that the word &#8220;blog&#8221; is nowhere to be found on t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PetroleumJelliffe</title>
		<link>http://www.seancoon.org/2006/01/att_blogging_made_speechless.html#comment-384</link>
		<author>PetroleumJelliffe</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seancoon.org/2006/01/att_blogging_made_speechless.html#comment-384</guid>
		<description>I just saw the on the NY Times homepage.  The link brings you to an AT&#38;T SBC merger site.  What the Hell does Blogging Delivered mean?  Is it like the old Heineken campaign with the red stars all over the place until they revealed what it was several months later?  Will AT&#38;T deliver us (from) blogging soon?  I'm on the edge of my seat here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw the on the NY Times homepage.  The link brings you to an AT&amp;T SBC merger site.  What the Hell does Blogging Delivered mean?  Is it like the old Heineken campaign with the red stars all over the place until they revealed what it was several months later?  Will AT&amp;T deliver us (from) blogging soon?  I&#8217;m on the edge of my seat here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Coon</title>
		<link>http://www.seancoon.org/2006/01/att_blogging_made_speechless.html#comment-361</link>
		<author>Sean Coon</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 21:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seancoon.org/2006/01/att_blogging_made_speechless.html#comment-361</guid>
		<description>Ain't being a corporate "creative" grand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ain&#8217;t being a corporate &#8220;creative&#8221; grand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Heaton</title>
		<link>http://www.seancoon.org/2006/01/att_blogging_made_speechless.html#comment-360</link>
		<author>Terry Heaton</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 20:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seancoon.org/2006/01/att_blogging_made_speechless.html#comment-360</guid>
		<description>I can imagine the meeting in the board room that preceded approval of the concept.

"But, boss, the logo works so well as an o..."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can imagine the meeting in the board room that preceded approval of the concept.</p>
<p>&#8220;But, boss, the logo works so well as an o&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It looks obvious</title>
		<link>http://www.seancoon.org/2006/01/att_blogging_made_speechless.html#comment-359</link>
		<author>It looks obvious</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 02:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seancoon.org/2006/01/att_blogging_made_speechless.html#comment-359</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Fighting &#8220;Wireless Philadelphia&#8221;&lt;/strong&gt;

  Since after I wrote about the &#34;Wireless Philadelphia &#34; I was wondering how broadband companies should fight this evil idea. I wouldn&#8217;t suggest lobbying, it may work in the short term but in the long term it is much more damaging. It i...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fighting &#8220;Wireless Philadelphia&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>  Since after I wrote about the &quot;Wireless Philadelphia &quot; I was wondering how broadband companies should fight this evil idea. I wouldn&rsquo;t suggest lobbying, it may work in the short term but in the long term it is much more damaging. It i&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Coon</title>
		<link>http://www.seancoon.org/2006/01/att_blogging_made_speechless.html#comment-358</link>
		<author>Sean Coon</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seancoon.org/2006/01/att_blogging_made_speechless.html#comment-358</guid>
		<description>i posted about that ad age piece a few posts back.

yeah, the at&#38;t thing is a classic example of a big corporation glomming onto something hot, but not being mobile or agile enough to back up what they're selling. it's sad, 'cause as much as i hate the late show to the party, at&#38;t has a large audience and a bunch of that audience might be hip to starting a blog if this campaign didn't confuse the hell out of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i posted about that ad age piece a few posts back.</p>
<p>yeah, the at&amp;t thing is a classic example of a big corporation glomming onto something hot, but not being mobile or agile enough to back up what they&#8217;re selling. it&#8217;s sad, &#8217;cause as much as i hate the late show to the party, at&amp;t has a large audience and a bunch of that audience might be hip to starting a blog if this campaign didn&#8217;t confuse the hell out of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tish G</title>
		<link>http://www.seancoon.org/2006/01/att_blogging_made_speechless.html#comment-357</link>
		<author>Tish G</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seancoon.org/2006/01/att_blogging_made_speechless.html#comment-357</guid>
		<description>ROTFLMAO!!

Dang! the whole thing just demonstrates the height of absurdity.  Now I know why so many people have no idea what blogging's about.  

BTW did you see this piece in Ad Age?:

http://www.adage.com/news.cms?newsId=47467

I *so* *just* *love* when people who know nothing about blogging decide they know it all about blogging.  Oh, the humanity!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ROTFLMAO!!</p>
<p>Dang! the whole thing just demonstrates the height of absurdity.  Now I know why so many people have no idea what blogging&#8217;s about.  </p>
<p>BTW did you see this piece in Ad Age?:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.adage.com/news.cms?newsId=47467" rel="nofollow">http://www.adage.com/news.cms?newsId=47467</a></p>
<p>I *so* *just* *love* when people who know nothing about blogging decide they know it all about blogging.  Oh, the humanity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Coon</title>
		<link>http://www.seancoon.org/2006/01/att_blogging_made_speechless.html#comment-349</link>
		<author>Sean Coon</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 06:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seancoon.org/2006/01/att_blogging_made_speechless.html#comment-349</guid>
		<description>I was expecting some type of glossy, blogging interstitial marketing page as a result, you know, a Johnny-come-lately to the party... man, this results page was too good to be true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was expecting some type of glossy, blogging interstitial marketing page as a result, you know, a Johnny-come-lately to the party&#8230; man, this results page was too good to be true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
