globeandmail
Extremists threaten peace, Clinton warns
by Bill Curry

[…]

Accusing violent fundamentalists of “religious heresy,” Mr. Clinton listed the major world faiths and said they all agree that human beings are flawed individuals in search of a divine truth.

“That’s okay. We can all live with each other believing there is truth. The trouble is whether you believe any flawed human being can be in absolute possession of that truth,” he said. “When you see this fellow [Abu Musab al-] Zarqawi who runs the al-Qaeda operation out of the Sunni section of Iraq hoping to dominate Jordan, saying his first priority is not to kill Jews, it’s not to kill Americans, it’s not to kill Westerners — his first priority is to kill Shiite Muslims and moderate Sunnis who don’t agree with him, what he calls the near enemy, you see this carried to its absurd link.”

Mr. Clinton then addressed such fundamentalists directly.

“If you believe anybody can actually completely know the truth and turn it into a political program that is completely true, then what do you need God for?” he asked. “The hope and idea of any religion is that all living human beings have imperfect knowledge and are imperfect by definition and that life is a journey toward the truth. When people short-circuit that and claim they have the truth and have a political program that’s absolutely true and if you don’t agree with me you’re less than human and I can kill you, which is what’s going on halfway around the world, that is the problem.

“If we don’t walk away from that, we’re going to tear the world apart. If we do, I believe the 21st century will be the most exciting, prosperous, interesting time the world has ever known and you don’t have the luxury of leaving that to the politicians,” he said.

[…]

Man, I miss Clinton.

Can you imagine the difference he’d make in office — with this type of a perspective — in a post-9/11 world? His quote on fundamentalist’s targeting the “near enemy” is spot on (Reza Aslan speaks of this in his book that I’m currently reading), though it would seem that neither the Bush administration nor the American press has any clue along these lines, as the only meme pumped into the media bullhorns is via the filters of the “War on Terror.”

Kent Bye and I touched upon the notion of truth in our conversation earlier in the week. If we can build social systems that aren’t organized around absolutes, and the participation levels reach a global, critical mass, we’ll go far in taming absolutist notions simply through the process of immersion and osmosis.

(via islamicate)


4 Responses to “Where Have You Gone, William Jefferson…?”  

  1. 1 Roch101

    Sigh…

    Can you imagine such thoughts articulated by W? Of course you can’t. Please, let us have a thinker for our next president.

  2. 2 Sean Coon

    it’s just refreshing to hear an ex-president frame the most important issue surrounding faith and religion; we human beings don’t hold the truth, for if we did, we wouldn’t need god.

    that simple axiom projects clinton way ahead of bush in the only realm that W is supposed to have any lead; spirituality.

    i’ll take that understanding over infidelity any day of the weak.

  3. 3 Jonny deuce

    You people are so far out of reality it is scary. Pick up a book of facts instead of liberal hype and you will learn that if we had a president instead of a fornicator in the white house in the 90’s, al quead would not have been able to pull off the 9/11 attacks. Wonder what documents sandy “burglar” stole to cover Clinton’s tracks in that whole mess. I know why the liberals don’t fear the islamoextremists, they are the extremists’ best allies in America. They don’t realize that their liberalism is what the extremists hate most about america and that the extremists don’t care about our politics, they are out to kill all of us.

  4. 4 sean coon

    way to stay on point, jd.