Vernon Robinson: Not In My House, Part II
Look, I’m pro-choice, yet I completely understand the opposition to abortion (the act). Everyone does. It’s safe to say that no woman has ever approached an abortion with a gleam in her eye.
This moral commonality — distinctly human — is what makes the debate between the pro-choice and anti-choice crowds so emotionally charged.
The question I pose to you is the following: If you are anti-choice, is the above discourse an example of the type of response that you want your Congresspersonto engage in?
If so, then where do our moral standards come into play? And if elected, how would Robinson’s tone affect his relationships with the rest of Congress and us — the constituents — across various topical issues?
(via Jay Ovittore)
Original coverage: Vernon Robinson: Not In My House
Tags: abortion, activism, anti choice, Congress, election, morality, politics, pro choice, Republican Party, Vernon Robinson.Search
No Tweets RSS feedLatest Posts
- at the doctor’s getting my ear…
- free money for music at amiest…
- look up justin catanoso’s stor…
- what’s more addicting than per…
- @rvhoss you narc.
- GSO is a worthless airport. ne…
- shot hoops for the second time…
- the downtown wyndham block par…
- will ridenour on the kora has …
- there’s a yetter outside my of…
What I Write About (see all)
- 9 11 accountability activism Adam Smith Problem advertising America antiwar artsy fartsy blogging business capitalism change citizen media community Congress corporation corruption creativity disturbing experience design film funny George Bush government graffiti Greensboro Hip hop humanity information architecture innovation inspiration internet Iraq War journalism lyrics media music New World Order New York City North Carolina personal philosophy photography poetry politics reality Republican Party terrorism video World 2.0

One Response to “Vernon Robinson: Not In My House, Part II”